当前位置:首页 / DRG支付方式改革对医院病组结构的影响
论著·卫生经济与政策 | 更新时间:2024-08-05
|
DRG支付方式改革对医院病组结构的影响
Effect of DRG payment method reform on hospital disease group structure

广西医学 页码:895-900

作者机构:杨喜旺,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为医院管理、DRG支付方式改革。

DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2024.06.18

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 分析疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)支付方式改革对医院病组结构的影响。方法 以某市唯一一家三级甲等医院作为样本医院,提取其2017—2019年及2021年依据国家医疗保障疾病诊断相关分组(CHS⁃DRG)1.0分组方案入组的住院病例结算数据。分析4年间该院住院病例的基本情况。利用服务组合赫芬达尔⁃赫希曼指数(SPEC)描述该院的病组结构集中度;采用中断时间序列分析(ITSA)评估DRG支付方式改革前后该院SPEC的变化趋势。采用多元线性回归模型分析该院病组选择偏好的影响因素。结果 (1)2017—2021年(不含2020年),该院的总权重、DRG病组数、病例组合指数均呈增长趋势。(2)ITSA结果显示,在改革前,该院的SPEC每月下降0.000 2(P<0.05),但改革后SPEC每月较改革前多增长0.000 5(P<0.05),即在改革后SPEC每月上升0.000 3。(3)改革后,DRG病组权重每增加1,DRG病组占比增长率较改革前多增加6.114%(P<0.05);DRG病组市场份额每增加1%,DRG病组占比增长率较改革前多增加1.066%(P<0.05)。结论 DRG支付方式改革使得样本医院收缩住院服务范围,病组结构更加集中,并且样本医院在改革后更加注重符合自身功能定位的高难度病组的发展。

Objective To analyze the effect of diagnosis related groups (DRG) payment method reform on hospital disease group structure. Methods Taking the only one class Ⅲ level A hospital from a city as a sample hospital, the settlement data of hospitalized cases enrolled according to China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups (CHS⁃DRG) 1.0 grouping protocol were extracted from 2017 to 2019, and 2021. The basic conditions of hospitalized cases in the hospital during 4 years were analyzed. The service mix Herfindahl⁃Hirschman index (SPEC) was used to describe disease group structure concentration of the hospital. The interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was employed to evaluate variation tendency of SPEC in the hospital before and after DRG payment method reform. The multiple linear regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors for disease group selection preference in the hospital. Results (1) From 2017 to 2021 (excluding 2020), the overall weight, number of DRG disease groups, and case mix index presented as an increased tendency. (2) The results of ITSA revealed that before reform, SPEC of the hospital decreased by 0.0002 per month (P<0.05), but after reform, SPEC increased by 0.0005 more per month than before reform (P<0.05), namely, after reform, SPEC increased by 0.0003 per month. (3) After reform, when the weight of DRG disease groups increased by 1, the growth rate of DRG disease groups' proportion increased by 6.114% as compared with before reform (P<0.05); in addition, when the market share of DRG disease groups increased by 1%, the growth rate of DRG disease groups' proportion increased by 1.066% as compared with before reform (P<0.05). Conclusion The DRG payment method reform makes the sample hospital shrinks the scope of inpatient services, and the structure of disease groups is more concentrated; moreover, the sample hospital pays more attention to the development of difficult disease groups in line with their own functional positioning after reform.

397

浏览量

71

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集