当前位置:首页 / 抗MCV抗体、抗CCP抗体对类风湿关节炎的诊断价值及其与疾病活动度的相关性
论著·临床研究 | 更新时间:2024-04-25
|
抗MCV抗体、抗CCP抗体对类风湿关节炎的诊断价值及其与疾病活动度的相关性
Diagnostic value of anti⁃MCV antibody and anti⁃CCP antibody on rheumatoid arthritis and their correlations with disease activity

广西医学 页码:53-58

作者机构:张宪波,硕士,副主任技师,研究方向为临床免疫学及微生物学检验。

基金信息:国家自然科学基金(81973932)

DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253⁃4304.2024.01.09

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 探讨抗突变型瓜氨酸波形蛋白(MCV)抗体、抗环瓜氨酸肽(CCP)抗体对类风湿关节炎(RA)的诊断价值,并分析其与RA疾病活动度的相关性。方法 选取74例RA患者(RA组)、95例结缔组织病患者(非RA组)和60例健康体检者(健康对照组)作为研究对象。基于红细胞沉降率的28个关节疾病活动度评分(DAS28⁃ESR)将RA组患者分为高活动期组(n=22)、中活动期组(n=18)、低活动期组(n=14)和缓解期组(n=20)。比较RA组、非RA组、健康对照组之间的血清抗MCV抗体、血清抗CCP抗体、血清类风湿因子(RF)和ESR阳性率,以及RA不同活动期组之间的血清抗MCV抗体水平、血清抗CCP抗体水平、血清RF水平和ESR。通过绘制受试者工作特征曲线分析血清抗MCV抗体水平、血清抗CCP抗体水平、血清RF水平和ESR单独及联合诊断RA的价值。分析RA组患者血清抗MCV抗体水平、血清抗CCP抗体水平、血清RF水平和ESR与DAS28⁃ESR的相关性。结果 (1)RA组的血清抗MCV抗体、血清抗CCP抗体、血清RF和ESR阳性率高于非RA组和健康对照组(P<0.05);非RA组的血清抗CCP抗体、血清RF和ESR阳性率高于健康对照组(P<0.05),但两组的血清抗MCV抗体阳性率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)缓解期组、低活动期组、中活动期组、高活动期组的血清抗MCV抗体水平、血清抗CCP抗体水平和ESR依次升高(P<0.05);高活动期组血清RF水平高于其他3组(P<0.05),其他3组之间的血清RF水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)血清抗MCV抗体水平、血清抗CCP抗体水平单独诊断RA的曲线下面积(AUC)均>0.85,且均大于血清RF水平和ESR的AUC(P<0.05);血清抗MCV抗体水平与血清抗CCP抗体水平诊断RA的敏感度、特异度、AUC差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);血清抗MCV抗体水平、血清抗CCP抗体水平、血清RF水平和ESR联合诊断RA的AUC达0.935,大于任意单一指标诊断RA的AUC(P<0.05)。(4)RA患者的血清抗MCV抗体水平、血清抗CCP抗体水平和ESR与DAS28⁃ESR均呈正相关(P<0.05)。结论 相比于传统指标血清RF和ESR,血清抗MCV抗体和血清抗CCP抗体对RA均有较高的诊断价值;将二者联合血清RF和ESR用于诊断RA,可明显提高诊断效能。血清抗MCV抗体水平、血清抗CCP抗体水平均与RA疾病活动度呈正相关,可作为评估患者疾病活动度的辅助指标。

Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of anti⁃mutated citrullinated vimentin (MCV) antibody and anti⁃cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody on rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to analyze their correlations with disease activity of RA. Methods A total of 74 RA patients (the RA group), 95 patients with connective tissue disease (the non⁃RA group), and 60 healthy check⁃up individuals (the healthy control group) were selected as the research subjects. Patients of the RA group were assigned to high⁃activity stage group (n=22), medium⁃activity stage group (n=18), low⁃activity stage group (n=14), or remission stage group (n=20) based on Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints⁃Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28⁃ESR). The positive rates of serum anti⁃MCV antibody, serum anti⁃CCP antibody, serum rheumatoid factor (RF), and ESR were compared between the RA group, the non⁃RA group and the healthy control group, as well as serum anti⁃MCV antibody level, serum anti⁃CCP antibody level, serum RF level, and ESR were compared between the groups of RA with different activity stages. The receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn to analyze the values of serum anti⁃MCV antibody level, serum anti⁃CCP antibody level, serum RF level, and ESR for alone and jointly diagnosing RA. The correlations of serum anti⁃MCV antibody level, serum anti⁃CCP antibody level, serum RF level, and ESR with DAS28⁃ESR were analyzed. Results (1) The RA group exhibited higher positive rates of serum anti⁃MCV antibody, serum anti⁃CCP antibody, serum RF, and ESR as compared with the non⁃RA group and the healthy control group (P<0.05). The non⁃RA group yielded higher positive rates of serum anti⁃CCP antibody, serum RF, and ESR as compared with the healthy control group (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in serum anti⁃MCV antibody positive rate between the two groups (P>0.05). (2) Serum anti⁃MCV antibody and serum anti⁃CCP antibody levels, as well as ESR were elevated successively in the remission stage group, and the low⁃, medium⁃ and high⁃activity stage groups (P<0.05); furthermore, the high⁃activity stage group interpreted a higher serum RF level as compared with the remaining 3 groups (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in serum RF level between the remaining 3 groups (P>0.05). (3) Areas under the curve (AUC) of serum anti⁃MCV antibody and serum anti⁃CCP antibody levels for alone diagnosing RA were all larger than 0.85, and all larger than AUC of serum RF level and ESR (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, and AUC between serum anti⁃MCV antibody level and serum anti⁃CCP antibody level for diagnosing RA (P>0.05); furthermore, AUC of serum anti⁃MCV antibody level, serum anti⁃CCP antibody level, serum RF level, and ESR for jointly diagnosing RA reached 0.935, which was larger than AUC of any single index for diagnosing RA (P<0.05). (4) Serum anti⁃MCV antibody and serum anti⁃CCP antibody levels, as well as ESR all positively correlated with DAS28⁃ESR in RA patients (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional indices in terms of serum RF and ESR, both serum anti⁃MCV antibody and serum anti⁃CCP antibody exert relatively high diagnostic values for RA, and the two combined with serum RF and ESR for diagnosing RA can significantly improve diagnostic efficiency. Serum anti⁃MCV antibody level and serum anti⁃CCP antibody level positively correlate with RA disease activity, which can be regarded as adjuvant indices for evaluating patients' disease activity.

763

浏览量

121

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集