广西医学

目的基于政策工具分析广西2011—2022年中医药发展相关政策，探讨广西中医药发展政策体系的侧重点和不足，为后续相关政策制定提供理论参考。方法基于政策工具维度（X维度）和中医药发展维度（Y维度）的二维分析框架，采用内容分析法对2011年12月至2022年12月广西出台的中医药发展相关政策文本进行编码和分析。结果最终纳入38份广西中医药发展相关政策文本进行研究。从政策工具维度来看，供给型政策工具使用最频繁（42.75%），其次是环境型政策工具（38.07%），使用最少的是需求型政策工具（19.18%），内部各子工具的使用存在不均衡的情况。从中医药发展维度来看，中医药支撑保障使用频率最高（29.72%），中药材产业使用频率最低（4.83%），各类别工具的使用也存在不均衡的情况。结论广西中医药发展相关政策涵盖面较广，但存在供给型政策工具侧重于人才教育及培养，而在信息化建设和资金投入方面有待加强，环境型政策工具在质量管理和金融支持方面的使用不足，需求型政策工具整体使用较少等结构不合理的问题。建议在未来政策制定过程中，通过增加中医药发展资金投入、提升中医药事业发展的有效拉动力、改善中医药发展外部环境、健全和优化不同类型政策工具的使用等措施，促进广西中医药发展目标的实现。

ObjectiveTo analyze the relevant policies of Traditional Chinese Medicine development in Guangxi from 2011 to 2022 based on policy tool, and to explore the emphases and deficiencies of Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medicine development policy system, so as to provide theoretical references for the subsequent relevant policy formulation. MethodsBased on the two-dimensional analysis framework of policy tool dimension (X dimension) and Traditional Chinese Medicine development dimension (Y dimension), the content analysis method was used to code and analyze the policy texts related to Traditional Chinese Medicine development issued in Guangxi from December 2011 to December 2022. ResultsA total of 38 policy texts related to Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medicine development were eventually enrolled to study. In terms of policy tool dimension, supply-oriented policy tool was used the most frequently (42.75%), followed by environmental policy tool (38.07%), and the least use was demand-oriented policy tool (19.18%); moreover, there was an imbalance in the use of various internal sub-tools. From the perspective of Traditional Chinese Medicine development dimension, the use of Traditional Chinese Medicine support and guarantee was the most frequent (29.72%), Chinese medicinal materials industry had the lowest frequency of use (4.83%); in addition, there was also an imbalance in the use of tools across various categories. ConclusionPolicies related to Traditional Chinese Medicine development in Guangxi cover a wide range of aspects, but there are some irrational structural problems such as supply-oriented policy tool focuses on talent education and training, while information construction and capital investment need to be strengthened, environmental policy tool is not used enough in quality management and financial support, and demand-oriented policy tool is rarely used. It is suggested that in the process of policy formulation in the future, the realization of Traditional Chinese Medicine development aim in Guangxi can be promoted by strategies of increasing capital investment for Traditional Chinese Medicine development, improving effective driving force for Traditional Chinese Medicine development, ameliorating external environment for Traditional Chinese Medicine development, and perfecting and optimizing the use of different types of policy tools, etc.